Silent Sentences
A book I keep coming back to is The Teacher's Toolkit by Paul Ginnis. It's a great reference point for fresh approaches to lessons and encouraging thought and engagement. I tried 'Silent Sentences' with my class from this text today. I had asked a Higher class to look over a case study of industry in South Wales. I thought about doing group responses to a set exercise, but we had used that the period before as the class moved round stations. I then thought about an extended heads and tails, but in this class, there are definite leaders within some groups who other students allow to steer the group. Nothing wrong in that, but I wanted to keep everyone focused and involved. Silent Sentences is similar to heads and tails. The students have to make sense of a bunch of mixed up text where sentences have been truncated and there often seems more than one way to complete it. The notable exception is that there is no discussion. Students split up the text and then have to anticipate when theirs will be needed without consultation. After a set time, I gave the groups a single minute for a quick discussion and then distributed the correct order. Two things were evident. The first was that their case study knowledge, whether studied or not, was good. Many of the finished paragraphs were almost identical to the one I had supplied and there was clear evidence of logic, concentration throughout the activity and full involvement of all group members. Secondly, all of the groups had worked on an assumption of what they were being asked to do just from content recognition. No one had asked "but, what is the question?". This added the dimension of allowing students to put themselves in an exam setters position and write (pretty accurately) the exam question, fantastic for helping break down what a question requires for full marks. I'd certainly use this again as it provided such a purposeful period of work and a better use of content than a teacher centred activity.

